November 29, 2004
The Holidays, or, When People Are Stupid
Please don't ask me
why we don't carry something when I've just told you we are happy to order it, but it isn't in our inventory. I know you don't understand why everyone doesn't want to read
Animals and the Afterlife (the actual title I discussed with this person), but everyone really doesn't. If I say it's not there, it's not that I, personally, made the decision to kick it from our shelves (or in this case, never carry it at all), it's that some buyer somewhere who gets paid more than me didn't want it. I don't know his or her logic. And I told you, I can order it especially for you if you really need it. Leave me alone.
It's not my fault if you don't know the freeways in San Diego. I've given the directions, it's up to you to Mapquest it or whatever.
Don't return your 1973 third of The Generic Travel Guide to Bora Bora, insisting that you just received it as a gift yesterday, when the 45th edition is now on the shelf.
"The book is blue, and it has a butterfly on the cover," is NOT an adequate description of the book you are looking for. I can only do so much. I know books, but I don't have every title in our inventory memorized.
That is all. For now.
Posted by: Ensie at
06:50 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 242 words, total size 1 kb.
Aspiring authors, take note!
How not to get a bookstore to carry your book:
Today I received a box via USPS Media Mail that contained 5 books, all hardcovers, none very impressive. The box had no purchase order listed on the outside (but did have "RE: Your book order" on it) and no invoice or packing list on the inside. There was an order form included with the prices of the books, which were exorbitant, to say the least. The order form also asked for $9.75 per book for shipping and handling charges (4 - 6 weeks to ship). Except that when you send things via Media Mail, I can see exactly how much you are ripping me off--it cost $5.76 to send all 5 books to me originally.
Now--the good part. No phone number was listed on the order form, so I did some research and found the publisher. I called and got the author on the phone. Our conversation was short:
Me: This is Ensie with Bob's Hogs and Weiner Pigs, and we received an order of your books today that we did not order. I need to return them, how would you like me to send them, and how would you like to pay for them?
She: Um, what books?
Me: Books you sent to us unsolicited. Books we will not pay for. Books I need to return.
She: Can you send them to another address for me?
Me: At our expense? (chuckle). Oh, no. No.
She: Shit.
Me: So, what would you like me to do with the books?
She: (long pause) I'll have to call you tomorrow.
Me: OK. My name, again, is Ensie. Do you want my number now?
She: No.
Me: How will you call me back then?
She: I have you on my caller ID.
Me: Oh, great! Then you'll recognize my number when I call you back if I don't hear from you tomorrow. Goodbye!
Don't think you can pull some lame scam on me. I know how it works...the holiday rush...books show up...we shelve them not realizing we didn't order them...and then you bill us for some crap we never would have ordered legitimately.
Hope you don't expect Bob's Hogs to EVER carry your books. I've already passed your info onto the Powers That Be. I'll be waiting for your call.
PS--I've been known to be very generous to small-time publishers and first-time authors if they contact me directly and want us to carry their stuff. Too bad you tried to rip me off first.
Posted by: Ensie at
06:41 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 429 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Un.Be.Lievable. What gall! It's like live spam. How bad is the book itself? Is it blue and has a butterfly on the cover?
Posted by: Eden at December 04, 2004 09:05 AM (Nix3e)
2
How did you know? Seriously. It does.
Posted by: ensie at December 04, 2004 05:11 PM (4k5pf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 24, 2004
The Wrongness of This is Overwhelming
Ewwww.
Mashed potatoes and gravy?!?
Greenbean casserole?
Does anyone like fruitcake in cake form, let alone liquid?
What's really odd is that they all have no calories, no carbs, and no caffeine. It's the perfect soda, except for the flavors.
Shudder.
Posted by: Ensie at
08:42 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I couldn't even drink those on a DARE!!!
Posted by: Dawn (webmiztris) at November 25, 2004 12:07 PM (b+zoX)
2
sounds like vomit in a bottle to me :-) cool blog btw x
Posted by: missfee at November 26, 2004 02:37 AM (SgQqe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Crazy vs. Crazy
I'm thinking this might need to be a new feature in the blog. Each week (or whenever I feel like it) I can locate some crazy people, then let you all decide who is crazier. This week we have a couple of contenders:
A California teacher has been banned from using the Declaration of Independence in the classroom. Apparently, the facts that God and references to Christianity exist within the Declaration make it unsuitable for use in a 5th grade classroom. That's right--the Declaration of Independence.
I don't think we should have forced school prayer or teach Creationism from the Christian perspective in the classroom. But I'm really not OK with eliminating any and all references to religion, Christian or other. The first Amendment to the US Constitution states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." Get it right people--it's freedom OF religion, not FROM religion. Our Founding Fathers acknowledged the existence of God, specifically the Christian God, and included Him in their historical documents. To erase religion from our past would require us to rewrite history and deny what made us. You can't change history because you don't agree with it.
The idea that people should be protected from anything that makes them remotely uncomfortable is ridiculous. I cannot understand this kind of logic. These same people are the ones that are often quick to point out that our diversity is what makes us great. You canÂ’t have it both ways.
The second person taking part in Crazy vs. Crazy is the really paranoid Mom from Texas who believes a school tradition could make kids gay. During Homecoming week the boys wear dresses and girls wear suits and they "reverse roles" for a day, known as "TWIRP" Day. "TWIRP" stands for "The Woman Is Requested To Pay," kind of a Sadie Hawkins Dance for the entire day. The Liberty Legal Institute stated, "It is outrageous that a school in a small town in East Texas would encourage their 4-year-olds to be cross-dressers."
Seriously? Cross-dressers?
Apparently, this parent in Texas has nothing better to do with her time than push sexualized ideas and messages on kids, instead of allowing them to have fun with a harmless tradition. This same mother does not have a problem with children dressing up for "Camo" Day, in which children will all wear camouflage. Apparently wearing camouflage doesn't predispose them to future bad fashion choices.
Posted by: Ensie at
06:26 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 415 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I think the mother who had the school cancel the 'cross-dressing' dance is the most ridiculous. It's even more ridiculous that they LISTENED to her.
Posted by: Dawn (webmiztris) at November 25, 2004 12:07 PM (b+zoX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 22, 2004
Time Suckage is an Art
I'm afraid my computer has been taken over by this

of late. It's not that don't want to post, or even that I don't have anything to post about. It's that every time I trun on the damn computer my hands automatically guide me to the Zoo Tycoon 2 icon.
But you can all think Stina, my excellent wedding reception planner and wife of a man who works for Sony, for giving me a copy of Everquest II; the next game guaranteed to suck my life away while staring at a computer screen.
Posted by: Ensie at
05:35 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
November 18, 2004
How good am I?
Just a few short days after
my post about Jude Law being the sexiest man right now,
People magazine goes and copies me! More proof that I am always right.

Ah. Pretty, pretty Jude Law.
Posted by: Ensie at
06:57 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
He is purdy.... ;-)
But it should be illegal to post Scott Peterson's photograph anywhere near Jude's. I hate that guy.
Posted by: Dawn (webmiztris) at November 19, 2004 08:39 AM (ASges)
2
Jude Law is ok , not really my type. Is his movie good
Posted by: LaShaundra at November 19, 2004 12:34 PM (LULM1)
3
Indeed you are!
Posted by: Chana at November 22, 2004 07:02 AM (zmdK+)
4
Dawn--I have an irrational hatred of Scott Peterson also. Or maybe it's just creepy assholes who kill their wives. That must be it!
Posted by: ensie at November 24, 2004 08:52 PM (4k5pf)
5
LaShaundra--Yes, I thought Alfie was good. If that was the movie you were referring to. Although he has also appeared in (or will be appearing in) the following this year:
Sky Captain: World of Tomorro
Closer
A Series of Unfortunate Events (voice of Lemony Snicket)
The Aviator
Posted by: ensie at November 24, 2004 08:56 PM (4k5pf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Coincidence?
Now, I love President Clinton as much as the next democrat, but doesn't this thing look like a giant mobile home?

Posted by: Ensie at
06:43 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
November 17, 2004
Lost could seriously make me lose my shit
The French woman is crazy. What's up with the whispers? What's the sickeness? Is that guy with the hives important? Are his hives important? Is Jack gay? Is Sawyer really coming around?
And most importantly--
TWO WEEKS! TWO!?! Are you kidding me? How can I wait TWO WEEKS? Isn't this November? Isn't it sweeps?
WTF?!
Posted by: Ensie at
09:07 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Why would Jack be gay? Isn't he always flirting with Kate?
Posted by: Richard at November 17, 2004 10:19 PM (fxq+S)
2
The big rumor is that he is. And I wouldn't say he's been flirting...I'd say Sawyer is flirting with Kate, and Jack has been friendly. Kate is obviously into Jack, and who knows what's going on with her and Sawyer. The kiss she gave him to get the goods on the inhalers was more than a simple kiss. There was no tongue implied in the deal, but there was plenty of it in the actual.
Posted by: ensie at November 18, 2004 05:48 PM (4k5pf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 13, 2004
Next time I'll just rent it
What a letdown Halo 2 is. Frinklin and I played cooperatively and finished in just over 10 hours. There was a potential breakdown in blogging this weekend at
Frinklin Speaks, but since we finished it so quickly, he's alreay posted his frustration with the game.
The graphics were better, the guns were fun, but the game has a familiar (not a homey, good familiar but a been there, done that familiar) feel to it with nothing all that surprising or different, except for the WORST ending ever. And that is including all the random Final Fantasy story lines (All the characters are adopted? And the villian is their foster mother?) Worse than THAT.
Posted by: Ensie at
10:08 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
November 12, 2004
A concensus on Jude Law
With apologies to
Zach Braff, my boyfriend. Oh, um, and my husband,
Frinklin.
While we may not agree on Brad Pitt (see this for the first addressing of this issue, and here for my feelings on Brad's personal hygiene), Katie and I do agree that Jude Law may represent the most perfect specimen of manhood in the remake of the movie Alfie.


Oh my God. I'm such a twelve year old girl.
Posted by: Ensie at
06:09 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Really? I don't see it- heÂ’s so gaunt and effeminate. I do agree with you on Brad Pitt though. He's a little too... I don't know...
Fabio.
Posted by: Richard at November 13, 2004 02:01 PM (///rM)
2
You are so right on Brad Pitt. Maybe it's the way he beefed up so much for
Troy, but I've always thought that he's skeezy. As I've established, I LIKE that look (Orlando Bloom? Plus there's the effeminate thing--have I mentioned I was a lesbian?), but there are definate exceptions--Frinklin doesn't look anything like that. But then there's also Katie, my sister, who thinks Brad Pitt is great, but also loves her 6'2" and very slim fiance. Go figure.
Posted by: ensie at November 13, 2004 07:13 PM (4k5pf)
3
Jude is very handsome, but I'm more Brad Pitt myself. There's just something about him that I'm wildly attracted to. I think the fact that he IS a little more 'dirty' is what I like. I'm already tired of these metrosexuals!!! They're too girly for me!! But still damn nice to look at... ;-)
Posted by: Dawn (webmiztris) at November 14, 2004 09:18 AM (b+zoX)
4
i'm a guy.. but i personally found the greatest one to be capt. jack sparrow.
and i think i should stop sounding gay on some-one else's blog.
and i see no reason to act that way on my own either.
*sigh - shooting my mouth off again*
cheerz
SEV
http://satish-ev.blogspot.com
Posted by: SEV at November 22, 2004 06:16 AM (y1JhU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Blower's Daughter
The song that has been stuck in my head constantly and playing on my iTunes incessently.

This Damien Rice song was playing at the end of the last episode of "The L Word" and is the first song in the trailer for the movie "Closer" (which guarantees to be the most pretentious movie ever, and I can't wait).
Posted by: Ensie at
05:48 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It might just be the best thing about the movie because I can't remember (since Jeff Buckley god rest his soul) the last time a song cut so hard into my soul...I can't take my mind of you...
Posted by: Erwin Heiser at May 26, 2005 07:06 PM (JhtHj)
2
ok this song is great........i can't stop listening to it.......I love Jeff Buckley too. ok, but can someone tell me what a blower's daughter is?
thanks crystal
Posted by: Crystal Krutzkamp at June 02, 2005 10:41 PM (zf1T0)
3
Apparently, a "blower" is one who uses a telephone in Britian. Maybe the father works for the phone company.
Posted by: resipsa at August 21, 2005 12:41 AM (ywZa8)
4
I think that the "Blower's Daughter" is quite literal and refers to a glass blower's daughter. I think that it is perfect for the movie "Closer" because Jane Jones is just a stripper. It's one profession that many people still look down upon, much like a glass blower's daughter in ages past.
She doesn't know why she is loved, she has nothing, she needs nothing, but she knows how to love and she will give that fully and when she is loved she believes she is loved fully and truly. She is blinded to what her calling is whether it is a life time of blowing glass or blowing her life naked for a slew of hungry lusting men.
Posted by: Matt at September 25, 2005 05:52 PM (oogdQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 11, 2004
Thank you
Posted by: Ensie at
05:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.
November 10, 2004
FYI
Ricola Lemon Mint Herb Drops "may have a mild laxative effect if consumed in large quantities."
Large quantites? Like the TWO that I sucked down this morning. I then spent the rest of the day listening to my stomach yell at me via various angry growls.
Posted by: Ensie at
05:58 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hang in there, darlin'. Hope you feel better soon!
Posted by: Mediocre Fred at November 10, 2004 07:07 PM (mYTgd)
2
Trading a sore throat for loose stool doesn't sound like a very good tradeoff to me... ;-)
Posted by: Dawn (webmiztris) at November 11, 2004 07:31 AM (wgFR5)
3
HHAAA that's horrible (and funny)
Posted by: Melissa at November 11, 2004 02:31 PM (MgIsg)
4
Thank you Fred. I feel much better. It only take a few hours for the evil cough drops to leave your system.
And Dawn--no. Not a good trade off. The lesson learned here is: Always read the package information before taking anything. Loose stools are not really a good trade off for much, to be honest.
And Melissa...here--would you like some cough drops?

Just kidding. Glad you laughed.
Posted by: ensie at November 11, 2004 05:30 PM (4k5pf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 09, 2004
Population Density Map
This particular one is also uses shades of purple to show which counties were just slightly Republican or Democrat.

A much better picture for the Democrats than we were originally seeing in the county map.
Found at Pearly Gates.
Posted by: Ensie at
05:47 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Things look much brighter for the Democrats in Jackson Pollock's America.
Posted by: Mediocre Fred at November 10, 2004 02:50 PM (mYTgd)
Posted by: ensie at November 10, 2004 05:43 PM (4k5pf)
3
Still an awful lot of red. And most of those purple counties are safely in the Republican column as well. (I think they used purple for anything
Posted by: Richard at November 10, 2004 07:59 PM (ySs5Q)
4
Damn thing cut me off...
...anything under 10%, so many aren't very close at all.)
Just wanted to kick you while you're down.
Posted by: Richard at November 10, 2004 08:01 PM (ySs5Q)
5
Thanks for thinking of me, Richard.
Posted by: ensie at November 11, 2004 05:31 PM (4k5pf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 08, 2004
Please help
Can someone please tell me where the thermometer is? I've been looking for it for a good 15 minutes with no luck. When you are feeling sick and possibly a little feverish it's really not so good to spend 15 minutes in bare feet seraching for a stupid thermometer.
Did I mention it's fucking cold here? I know it's autumn and all, but enough with the rain and the frost and the coldness. It's San Diego. On the upside, the dogs are quicker when they go out to pee.
Posted by: Ensie at
05:39 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It is under the sink in the bathroom behind the hordes of toilet paper. It fell down there 6 months ago when your nosey friends were going through your medicine cabnit, and they didn't see what fell or where it went. So look there, check your temp, drink some OJ and go take a nap.
Posted by: Nightmare54 at November 08, 2004 06:56 PM (AsOsS)
Posted by: Violet at November 10, 2004 06:30 AM (o3zeO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Congratulations Katie!
My sister got a job! She starts on Friday. Yay! (And discounts for me!)
Posted by: Ensie at
05:36 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
November 05, 2004
Hope
Well, that whole election thing sucked. And if you're happy that Bush was relected, then good for you. I really am happy for you. I just wish I could be happy for me, too. Because I really don't like our President's take on many issues. I can't grasp the way that his brain works. And yes, I do believe that he thinks. I don't think he's an idiot, as many seem to. I have enough faith in America that we wouldn't pick a complete moron to run our country.
I just can't wrap my mind around the belief that two people loving eachother enough to want to make a lifelong committment is wrong. Just horribly, horribly wrong.
Or that making America strong means elevating ourselves above every other country with an arrogance that is stunning.
Or that admitting mistakes and changing our approach makes us weak somehow.
Or that it's more important to have power and grant favors than to do the right thing.
Or that our natural resources are only there to be used up.
These are not the values I want to teach to my children someday. I want to have a President that I can admire and be proud of. I sincerely hope that this term will be different than the last.
Posted by: Ensie at
05:20 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 217 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Isn't there something to be said for doing what one believes is right? That's not arrogance (btw, Bush has owned up to his mistakes- but remember that just because
you think something was a mistake doesn't make it so)- itÂ’s called integrity, and itÂ’s a quality that was sorely lacking in his opponent.
And I still don't understand how you could be so disgusted by a candidate like Bush for being (supposedly) anti-gay and pro-war, yet support a man like Kerry, who stands for many of the same positions (or at least claims to, when politically expedient).
Posted by: Richard at November 05, 2004 05:53 PM (sHTZh)
2
And just because
you believe that something isn't a mistake doesn't mean it isn't.
Just when has Bush owned up to those mistakes? Certainly not when he was asked in a debate, directly, to list a few mistakes.
Bush bleeds arrogance. His treatment of those who don't agree with him and his attitude that the US can and will do whatever it wants in the world without thought for the other nations shows it. I'm not just talking about Iraq (btw, I've never stated that it was a mistake to go into Iraq. I'm confused by our lack of planning now that we're there, but I think we should stay there and fix it now that we've ousted Saddam), I'm speaking of the environment, and our general attitude toward our place in the world, among other things. The decisions we make effect other countries, and a good leader takes into consideration how his actions effect others. Nowhere have I stated that we must have the leave of other countries whenever we make a decison, but Bush has made it abundantly clear that he could give a rat's ass about the positions of much of the rest of the world.
I also belive that John Kerry has a better plan for the US than that which we are currently following. I can't say that I feel Bush has the best integrity, what with his business ethics being sorely lacking. As I stated, I want the President to be someone I can admire, and to lead by example. This is not a man I would want my future children to look up to.
Lastly, when it comes to gay marriage, this is an issue near and dear to me. Bush has stated time and again that he would like there to be a Constiutional Ammendment banning gay marriage. Kerry has stated that he would make Civil Unions legal. Which would you say is more pro-gay? While Civil Unions aren't marriage, they are step in the right direction. Bush's actions are a that of a man clearly uncomfortable with homosexuality, and unable or unwilling to see a gay person's love for his or her partner as the same as his love for his wife.
Posted by: ensie at November 05, 2004 06:23 PM (4k5pf)
3
Well, considering that Bush came out in favor of civil unions, I'd say they're both the same level of "pro-gay".
Posted by: Richard at November 05, 2004 06:33 PM (jzzPg)
4
Also it should be mentioned that in the debate you speak of, Bush did talk about mistakes he has made. He spoke specifically of tactical mistakes in the war- he just didn't come up with the answer most liberals wanted to hear, so he got crushed for it.
Posted by: Richard at November 05, 2004 06:46 PM (jzzPg)
5
Oh right! How could I forget? Bush is so pro-gay, I must have missed his bullshit statement about how he's for civil unions and all that work he's been doing the last four years to make that happen. It probably just was drowned out in the, again, CONSTITUTIONAL AMMENDMENT TO BAN GAY MARRIAGE. The one that he was strongly in support of that also happened to ban any sort of legal recognition of gay relationships, including civil unions.
Marilyn Musgrave's ammendment:
"Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status
or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups."
Besides, do you really think the religious right would let him off his leash long enough to make that happen?
Posted by: ensie at November 05, 2004 07:41 PM (4k5pf)
6
Neither of us are what you'd call experts in the world of constitutional law, but the consensus in Washington was that this amendment would not have banned civil unions. While the wording makes it seem that was the case, it does not expressly ban civil unions, and no court in this country would interpret as such.
For the record,
here are Bush's statements regarding civil unions.
And yes, Bush has done nothing to advance gay rights during his four years as President. But what has John Kerry done over his 20 years as a Senator (he supports hate-crime legislation, as does Bush, but thatÂ’s about it)? Both of these men campaigned on an anti-gay platform- Kerry just did it quietly in black churches all over America, whereas Bush came right out and said it.
Posted by: Richard at November 05, 2004 09:06 PM (McACp)
7
Sorry,
this is the link to Bush's statements about civil unions.
Posted by: Richard at November 05, 2004 09:07 PM (McACp)
8
And the "mistakes" Bush owned up to:
"And in a war, there's a lot of -- there's a lot of tactical decisions that historians will look back and say: He shouldn't have done that. He shouldn't have made that decision. And I'll take responsibility for them. I'm human."
I wouldn't say that's admitting to any specific mistakes. He's saying that
should anything he's done be judged a mistake, he'll own up to it, and that history will tell the tale. A true statement, that history will have better perspective on his decisions, but still not owning up to any specific errors or mistakes.
Posted by: ensie at November 05, 2004 09:08 PM (4k5pf)
9
How can you say it doesn't ban civil unions?? The actual words in the proposed ammendment state just that! And how do you know that no court would interpret it that way? Kerry didn't campaign as anti-gay. He stated that he is not in favor of gay marriage, but definately supports civil unions. Please read
this to see Kerry's statements and stances on gay issues. And on President Bush's record--while Gov. of Texas he sought to take away gay couples' ability to adopt and didn't feel that homosexuals were covered under hate crime legislation. I'd say there are some serious differences there.
Posted by: ensie at November 05, 2004 09:59 PM (4k5pf)
10
I'm totally with you, ensie.
Bush staying put in the White House scares the shit out of me. The pro-gay thing is near to me too (because one of my best friends is a lesbian), and the thought that the MAJORITY of people are against her being happy and treated fairly just blows my mind.
Posted by: Dawn (webmiztris) at November 06, 2004 05:57 AM (b+zoX)
11
Ensie, your post was so well put! I agree wholeheartedly!
Posted by: Violet at November 08, 2004 06:18 AM (HhDyc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
66kb generated in CPU 0.1759, elapsed 0.234 seconds.
102 queries taking 0.1651 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.